Reply To: CIDP not a highlight

March 4, 2012 at 10:00 pm

That’s a good idea. It may be that there are fewer such stories published merely because fewer are submitted, because, as you indicate, the inconclusive nature of the condition.

I don’t mind second billing, however. CIDP could be better covered, but the incidence is lower than for GBS, and the condition less well understood, which explain lower coverage.